Stockwell slaying: IPCC gets tough

db: The Guardian reports that Nick Hardwick, chairman of the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) has been critical of the Home Office for releasing 'partial information' concerning Mr De Menezes - the Brazilian killed by police in Stockwell - in a reference to the release by government officials of detail concerning the immigration status of Mr De Menezes - and allegations of possible fraud in that the stamp used to authorise an "indefinite leave to remain" visa was apparently, according to the Home Office 'not in use' at the time of issue.

Interviewed on BBC radio 'World at One' he was critical of both the Home Office and the police for the statements they have released - and requested that they shut up. Mr Hardwick was strong in his assertion of independence regarding both the scope and focus of his investigation - he rejected calls from some parties that he should avoid 'operational issues' - and aggressively set out his absolute authority in all matters concerning this investigation into the slaying of the utterly innocent Mr De Menezes - an act for which, Nick Hardwick promises, people will be held to account.

"distasteful and disgraceful"

Asad Rehman, spokesman for Mr De Menezes' family, said it was "distasteful and disgraceful" that the Home Office should release information about him - and he is right. Is this a new policy? Will the next victim of police incompetence be labeled a 'dole scrounger', or more likely a 'failed asylum seeker'?

It appears that Nick Hardwick may well do a reasonable job for the family and friends of Mr De Menezes - and indeed all non-pure-white residents of London who may find themselves running towards the tube or away from gun-toting blokes in baseball hats. However, even if my optimistic assessment proves to be correct, it does not mean that Mr Hardwick's recommendations will be implemented - because his authority, as powerful as it seems, does not extend that far.